Every major economic forecast by this administration has been wrong so far. That's right, every forecast! Please tell me what I heard is wrong. New soaring National deficit defies forecast. All these trillions are amounting... and boy are they.... Each trillion represents 50 billion of interest, annually. Seriously?? What a mess..The future is that time when you’ll wish you’d done what you aren’t doing now.
Check this out:
Click here for a web page explanaton
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
In Pursuit of a Silent Majority
Like Richard Nixon, Barack Obama wants to govern on the strength of a silent majority, although with a twist. Obama wants the majority that opposes or questions his policies to stay silent.
Obama's White House and its allies have unleashed a barrage of criticism and condescension at people daring to show up at town-hall meetings and ask their elected representatives pointed questions. "Fired up and ready to go!" apparently works only one way. If engaged citizens shower Obama with adoration at stage-managed rallies, they are the very stuff of American democracy. If they boo their congressman, they are a scandalous eruption of fake or hateful sentiment.
The Democratic National Committee has called the hostile questioners and protesters at town halls a "mob." White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said that they represent "manufactured anger" ginned up by nefarious corporate interests, and referred to them as "the Brooks Brothers brigade." California Sen. Barbara Boxer, too, took offense at the untoward lack of shabby dress, noting with disapproval that the protesters are "well-dressed." It's the attack of the haut-polloi.
All of these Obama mouthpieces must forget that the president once was a community organizer. As a young man in Chicago, he got people to meetings and primed them with questions to ask city officials. By the Gibbs standard, when Obama prodded his community activists to get the Chicago Housing Authority to remove asbestos from a public-housing complex in the 1980s, it was contemptible "manufactured" outrage.
Conservative groups are publicizing the times and locations of town-hall meetings on the Internet. They are calling and e-mailing people on their membership lists and urging them to make their voices heard. No one prior to the troubled career of ObamaCare thought town-hall meetings should be closely held secrets, or considered basic block-and-tackle political organizing as out of bounds.
Obama once extolled such organizing as one of the marvels of American democracy. The same DNC operative who attacked the "angry mobs of a small number of rabid right-wing extremists" ran a union-funded group in 2005 opposing President George W. Bush's Social Security reform. It organized protests and town-hall meetings, and ran TV ads. But never mind — it's activism for me, not for thee.
The Obama team labors under the misapprehension that its sweeping, $1 trillion health-care plan is popular. Pluralities in almost every poll disapprove of the Democrats' proposals and disapprove of Obama's handling of health care. Polls show that opponents of ObamaCare feel more intensely about the issue than supporters. It's not surprising, then, that town-hall meetings would be uncomfortable for members of Congress plugging for ObamaCare.
In politics, every action prompts a reaction. If Obama had had his way, health-care reform would have passed both houses of Congress a week ago in a pure power play. If Obama gets his maximalist version of reform through, he will depend less on persuasion than sheer political muscle in Washington. Only a public quiescent to the point of obedience would meekly accept a rush to reorder one-sixth of the economy. And only a conservative opposition that had curled up and died wouldn't raise holy hell.
The ultimate point of the attacks on the town-hall protesters is to define that opposition as illegitimate. Which is also why liberal opinion-makers are so obsessed with the "birther" conspiracy theorists who believe Obama was born in Kenya. The birthers have been denounced by every reputable conservative. But the left still wants to use them to tar all Republicans as extreme in what it hopes will be a self-fulfilling narrative of conservative obsolescence.
This narrative will encounter the same difficulty as the health-care plan has: reality. Obama is sinking toward a 50 percent presidency, with the public evenly divided over him. In New Jersey and Virginia gubernatorial races this year, Republicans are both leading by 14 points in the latest polls and appealing to the center. No matter how fervently Obama may wish it to be so, his skeptics won't be silent.
Thank you Rich Lowry
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com
Obama's White House and its allies have unleashed a barrage of criticism and condescension at people daring to show up at town-hall meetings and ask their elected representatives pointed questions. "Fired up and ready to go!" apparently works only one way. If engaged citizens shower Obama with adoration at stage-managed rallies, they are the very stuff of American democracy. If they boo their congressman, they are a scandalous eruption of fake or hateful sentiment.
The Democratic National Committee has called the hostile questioners and protesters at town halls a "mob." White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said that they represent "manufactured anger" ginned up by nefarious corporate interests, and referred to them as "the Brooks Brothers brigade." California Sen. Barbara Boxer, too, took offense at the untoward lack of shabby dress, noting with disapproval that the protesters are "well-dressed." It's the attack of the haut-polloi.
All of these Obama mouthpieces must forget that the president once was a community organizer. As a young man in Chicago, he got people to meetings and primed them with questions to ask city officials. By the Gibbs standard, when Obama prodded his community activists to get the Chicago Housing Authority to remove asbestos from a public-housing complex in the 1980s, it was contemptible "manufactured" outrage.
Conservative groups are publicizing the times and locations of town-hall meetings on the Internet. They are calling and e-mailing people on their membership lists and urging them to make their voices heard. No one prior to the troubled career of ObamaCare thought town-hall meetings should be closely held secrets, or considered basic block-and-tackle political organizing as out of bounds.
Obama once extolled such organizing as one of the marvels of American democracy. The same DNC operative who attacked the "angry mobs of a small number of rabid right-wing extremists" ran a union-funded group in 2005 opposing President George W. Bush's Social Security reform. It organized protests and town-hall meetings, and ran TV ads. But never mind — it's activism for me, not for thee.
The Obama team labors under the misapprehension that its sweeping, $1 trillion health-care plan is popular. Pluralities in almost every poll disapprove of the Democrats' proposals and disapprove of Obama's handling of health care. Polls show that opponents of ObamaCare feel more intensely about the issue than supporters. It's not surprising, then, that town-hall meetings would be uncomfortable for members of Congress plugging for ObamaCare.
In politics, every action prompts a reaction. If Obama had had his way, health-care reform would have passed both houses of Congress a week ago in a pure power play. If Obama gets his maximalist version of reform through, he will depend less on persuasion than sheer political muscle in Washington. Only a public quiescent to the point of obedience would meekly accept a rush to reorder one-sixth of the economy. And only a conservative opposition that had curled up and died wouldn't raise holy hell.
The ultimate point of the attacks on the town-hall protesters is to define that opposition as illegitimate. Which is also why liberal opinion-makers are so obsessed with the "birther" conspiracy theorists who believe Obama was born in Kenya. The birthers have been denounced by every reputable conservative. But the left still wants to use them to tar all Republicans as extreme in what it hopes will be a self-fulfilling narrative of conservative obsolescence.
This narrative will encounter the same difficulty as the health-care plan has: reality. Obama is sinking toward a 50 percent presidency, with the public evenly divided over him. In New Jersey and Virginia gubernatorial races this year, Republicans are both leading by 14 points in the latest polls and appealing to the center. No matter how fervently Obama may wish it to be so, his skeptics won't be silent.
Thank you Rich Lowry
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com
Monday, July 13, 2009
Do You See The Private Sector Going Away?
Democrats have bid adieu to the business community, they have become entirely disconnected from any understanding of how the private sector works. He wrote:
"Put it this way: Imagine any of this generation's Democratic establishment taking a job at Procter & Gamble in Cincinnati as a middle-manager responsible for a division of employees and its annual profit and loss. It is wholly inconceivable. Or helping an owner of an auto-parts company in Austin manage through a real crisis. They wouldn't have a clue. Some of Mr. Obama's supporters need to reboot their vision. They did not sign on just to him, but to him and his party. That party is creating a world of its own, a world being drained of oxygen for the kind of people who build the nation's economy."
"Put it this way: Imagine any of this generation's Democratic establishment taking a job at Procter & Gamble in Cincinnati as a middle-manager responsible for a division of employees and its annual profit and loss. It is wholly inconceivable. Or helping an owner of an auto-parts company in Austin manage through a real crisis. They wouldn't have a clue. Some of Mr. Obama's supporters need to reboot their vision. They did not sign on just to him, but to him and his party. That party is creating a world of its own, a world being drained of oxygen for the kind of people who build the nation's economy."
Friday, July 3, 2009
The Wisdom of Charles Krauthammer
Subject: Krauthammer
Date: July 3rd, 2009
OK... here is my preface to this rant and rave.
Charles Krauthammer (born March 13, 1950) is an American Pulitzer Prize-winning syndicated columnist and a prominent political commentator. His weekly column appears in the The Washington Post and is syndicated in more than 200 newspapers and media outlets. He is a contributing editor to the Weekly Standard and The New Republic. He is a Fox News contributor, a regular panelist on Fox’s evening news program Special Report with Bret Baier and a weekly panelist on Inside Washington.
My uncle in Ohio had a friend that went to hear Charles Krauthammer. He listened with 25 others in a closed room. What he says here, is NOT 2nd-hand but 1st. You would do well to read and pass this along to EVERYBODY who loves his country. This is VERY serious for the direction of our country. The ramifications are staggering for us and our children.
Charles Krauthammer Speech/Comments on the 'New Economy' and Barack Obama whom I call the "Dirty Wizard".
To my friends and associates:
Last Monday was a profound evening, hearing Dr. Charles Krauthammer speak to the Center for the American Experiment. He is a brilliant intellectual, seasoned and articulate. He is forthright and careful in his analysis, and never resorts to emotions Or personal insults. He is NOT a fear monger nor an extremist in his comments And views. He is a fiscal conservative and holds a Pulitzer Prize. He writes weekly for the Washington Post and is a frequent contributor to Fox News. The entire room was held spellbound during his talk. I have shared this with many of you and several have asked me to summarize his comments, as we are living in uncharted waters economically And internationally. Even 2 democrats at my table agreed with everything he said! If you feel like forwarding this to those who are open minded and have not 'drunk the Kool-Aid', feel free.
A summary of his comments:
1. Mr. Obama is a very intellectual, charming individual. He is not to be underestimated. He is a 'cool customer' who doesn't show his emotions. It's very hard to know what's "behind the mask". Taking down the Clinton dynasty from a political neophyte was an amazing accomplishment. The Clinton's still do not
understand what hit them. Obama was in the perfect place at the perfect time.
2. Obama has political skills comparable to Reagan and Clinton. He has a way of making you think he's on your side, agreeing with your position, while doing the opposite. Pay no attention to what he SAYS; rather, watch what he DOES!
3. Obama has a ruthless quest for power. He did not come to Washington to make something out of himself, but rather to change everything, including dismantling capitalism. He can't be straightforward on his ambitions, as the public would not go along. He has a heavy hand and wants to 'level the playing field' with income redistribution and punishment of the achievers of society. He would like to model the USA to Great Britain or Canada .
4. His three main goals are to control ENERGY, PUBLIC EDUCATION, and NATIONAL HEALTHCARE by the Federal Government. He doesn't care about the auto or financial services industries, but got them as an early bonus. The cap and trade will add costs to everything and stifle growth. Paying for FREE college education is his goal. Most scary is healthcare program, because if you make it FREE and add 46,000,000 people to a Medicare-type single-payer system, the Costs will go thru the roof. The only way to control costs is with massive RATIONING of services, like in Canada . God forbid.
5. He's surrounded himself with mostly far-left academic types, none of which around him has ever run even a candy store. But they're going to try and run the auto, financial, banking and other industries. This obviously can't work in the long run. Obama's not a socialist; rather a far-left secular progressive bent on Nothing short of revolution. He ran as a moderate, but will govern from the hard left. Again, watch what he does, not what he says.
6. Obama doesn't really see himself as President of the USA , more as a ruler over the world. He sees himself above it all, trying to orchestrate and coordinate various Countries and their agendas. He sees moral equivalency in all cultures. His apology tour in Germany and England was a prime example of how he sees America, as an imperialist nation that has been arrogant, rather than a great Noble nation that has at times made errors. This is the 1st President ever who has chastised our allies and appeased our enemies at the same time!
7. He's now handing out goodies. He hopes that the bill (and pain) will not 'come due' until after he's reelected in 2012. He'd like to blame all problems on Bush from the past and hopefully his successor in the future. He has a huge ego and Mr. Krauthammer believes he is a narcissist.
8. Republicans are in the wilderness for a while, but will emerge strong. We're 'pining' for another Reagan, but there'll never be another like him. He believes Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty and Bobby Jindahl (except for his terrible speech in February) are the future of the party. Newt Gingrich is brilliant, but has baggage. Sarah Palin is sincere and intelligent, but needs to really be seriously boning up on facts and info if she's to be a serious candidate in the future. We need to return to the party of lower taxes, smaller government, Personal responsibility, strong national defense, and states' rights. This is a MUST: She must stop talking in cliches and platitudes.
9. The current level of spending is irresponsible and outrageous. We're spending trillions that we don't have. This could lead to hyper inflation, depression or worse. No country has ever spent themselves into prosperity. The media is giving Obama, Reid, and Pelosi a pass because they love their agenda. But eventually the bill will come due and people will realize the huge bailouts didn't work, nor will the stimulus package. These were trillion-dollar payoffs to Obama's allies, unions and the Congress to placate the left, so he can get support for #4 above.
10. The election was over in mid-Sept. when Lehman brothers failed. Fear and panic swept in, we had an unpopular President, and the war was grinding on indefinitely without a clear outcome. The people are in pain, and the mantra of 'change' caused people to act emotionally. Any Dim would have won this election; it was surprising it was as close as it was.
11. In 2012, if the unemployment rate is over 10%, Republicans will be swept back into power. If it's under 8%, the Dims continue to roll. If it's between 8-10%, it'll be a dogfight. It'll all be about the economy.
I hope this gets you really thinking a bout what's happening in
Washington and Congress. There's a left-wing revolution going on,
according to Krauthammer, and he encourages Us to keep the faith and
join the loyal resistance. The work will be hard, but we're right on
most issues and can reclaim our country, before it's far Too late.
This, in my opinion has been my most important blog to date.
If you think I'm full of crap.... TELL ME! If you think I'm correct on what I've observed.... TELL ME! Please let me know YOUR thoughts!
I cringe when I see what the Dirty Wizard is doing to OUR country. Frigg'n Pathetic!!
Date: July 3rd, 2009
OK... here is my preface to this rant and rave.
Charles Krauthammer (born March 13, 1950) is an American Pulitzer Prize-winning syndicated columnist and a prominent political commentator. His weekly column appears in the The Washington Post and is syndicated in more than 200 newspapers and media outlets. He is a contributing editor to the Weekly Standard and The New Republic. He is a Fox News contributor, a regular panelist on Fox’s evening news program Special Report with Bret Baier and a weekly panelist on Inside Washington.
My uncle in Ohio had a friend that went to hear Charles Krauthammer. He listened with 25 others in a closed room. What he says here, is NOT 2nd-hand but 1st. You would do well to read and pass this along to EVERYBODY who loves his country. This is VERY serious for the direction of our country. The ramifications are staggering for us and our children.
Charles Krauthammer Speech/Comments on the 'New Economy' and Barack Obama whom I call the "Dirty Wizard".
To my friends and associates:
Last Monday was a profound evening, hearing Dr. Charles Krauthammer speak to the Center for the American Experiment. He is a brilliant intellectual, seasoned and articulate. He is forthright and careful in his analysis, and never resorts to emotions Or personal insults. He is NOT a fear monger nor an extremist in his comments And views. He is a fiscal conservative and holds a Pulitzer Prize. He writes weekly for the Washington Post and is a frequent contributor to Fox News. The entire room was held spellbound during his talk. I have shared this with many of you and several have asked me to summarize his comments, as we are living in uncharted waters economically And internationally. Even 2 democrats at my table agreed with everything he said! If you feel like forwarding this to those who are open minded and have not 'drunk the Kool-Aid', feel free.
A summary of his comments:
1. Mr. Obama is a very intellectual, charming individual. He is not to be underestimated. He is a 'cool customer' who doesn't show his emotions. It's very hard to know what's "behind the mask". Taking down the Clinton dynasty from a political neophyte was an amazing accomplishment. The Clinton's still do not
understand what hit them. Obama was in the perfect place at the perfect time.
2. Obama has political skills comparable to Reagan and Clinton. He has a way of making you think he's on your side, agreeing with your position, while doing the opposite. Pay no attention to what he SAYS; rather, watch what he DOES!
3. Obama has a ruthless quest for power. He did not come to Washington to make something out of himself, but rather to change everything, including dismantling capitalism. He can't be straightforward on his ambitions, as the public would not go along. He has a heavy hand and wants to 'level the playing field' with income redistribution and punishment of the achievers of society. He would like to model the USA to Great Britain or Canada .
4. His three main goals are to control ENERGY, PUBLIC EDUCATION, and NATIONAL HEALTHCARE by the Federal Government. He doesn't care about the auto or financial services industries, but got them as an early bonus. The cap and trade will add costs to everything and stifle growth. Paying for FREE college education is his goal. Most scary is healthcare program, because if you make it FREE and add 46,000,000 people to a Medicare-type single-payer system, the Costs will go thru the roof. The only way to control costs is with massive RATIONING of services, like in Canada . God forbid.
5. He's surrounded himself with mostly far-left academic types, none of which around him has ever run even a candy store. But they're going to try and run the auto, financial, banking and other industries. This obviously can't work in the long run. Obama's not a socialist; rather a far-left secular progressive bent on Nothing short of revolution. He ran as a moderate, but will govern from the hard left. Again, watch what he does, not what he says.
6. Obama doesn't really see himself as President of the USA , more as a ruler over the world. He sees himself above it all, trying to orchestrate and coordinate various Countries and their agendas. He sees moral equivalency in all cultures. His apology tour in Germany and England was a prime example of how he sees America, as an imperialist nation that has been arrogant, rather than a great Noble nation that has at times made errors. This is the 1st President ever who has chastised our allies and appeased our enemies at the same time!
7. He's now handing out goodies. He hopes that the bill (and pain) will not 'come due' until after he's reelected in 2012. He'd like to blame all problems on Bush from the past and hopefully his successor in the future. He has a huge ego and Mr. Krauthammer believes he is a narcissist.
8. Republicans are in the wilderness for a while, but will emerge strong. We're 'pining' for another Reagan, but there'll never be another like him. He believes Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty and Bobby Jindahl (except for his terrible speech in February) are the future of the party. Newt Gingrich is brilliant, but has baggage. Sarah Palin is sincere and intelligent, but needs to really be seriously boning up on facts and info if she's to be a serious candidate in the future. We need to return to the party of lower taxes, smaller government, Personal responsibility, strong national defense, and states' rights. This is a MUST: She must stop talking in cliches and platitudes.
9. The current level of spending is irresponsible and outrageous. We're spending trillions that we don't have. This could lead to hyper inflation, depression or worse. No country has ever spent themselves into prosperity. The media is giving Obama, Reid, and Pelosi a pass because they love their agenda. But eventually the bill will come due and people will realize the huge bailouts didn't work, nor will the stimulus package. These were trillion-dollar payoffs to Obama's allies, unions and the Congress to placate the left, so he can get support for #4 above.
10. The election was over in mid-Sept. when Lehman brothers failed. Fear and panic swept in, we had an unpopular President, and the war was grinding on indefinitely without a clear outcome. The people are in pain, and the mantra of 'change' caused people to act emotionally. Any Dim would have won this election; it was surprising it was as close as it was.
11. In 2012, if the unemployment rate is over 10%, Republicans will be swept back into power. If it's under 8%, the Dims continue to roll. If it's between 8-10%, it'll be a dogfight. It'll all be about the economy.
I hope this gets you really thinking a bout what's happening in
Washington and Congress. There's a left-wing revolution going on,
according to Krauthammer, and he encourages Us to keep the faith and
join the loyal resistance. The work will be hard, but we're right on
most issues and can reclaim our country, before it's far Too late.
This, in my opinion has been my most important blog to date.
If you think I'm full of crap.... TELL ME! If you think I'm correct on what I've observed.... TELL ME! Please let me know YOUR thoughts!
I cringe when I see what the Dirty Wizard is doing to OUR country. Frigg'n Pathetic!!
Thursday, July 2, 2009
An Unknown Author's Letter to The Dirty Wizard (Obama)
This letter should be sent to every network and this person should be put on the show-except for Oprah, Shit, hell fire.... she'd NEVER allow this no matter how true it is.
This unknown author told the truth and hit it right on the money. No fooling around. WOW what a letter!!!
This person stood up for what he / she believed in!!!!!! WAKE UP PEOPLE....
April 17, 2009
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington , DC 20500
Mr. Obama:
> I have had it with you and your administration, sir. Your conduct on your recent trip overseas has convinced me that you are not an adequate representative of the United States of America collectively or of me personally.
> You are so obsessed with appeasing the Europeans and the Muslim world that you have abdicated the responsibilities of the President of the United States of America. You are responsible to the citizens of the United States ... You are not responsible to the people of any other country on Earth.
> I personally resent that you go around the world apologizing for the United States telling Europeans that we are arrogant and do not care about their status in the world. Sir, what do you think the First World War and the Second World War were all about if not the consideration of the people of Europe ? Are you brain dead? What do you think the Marshall Plan was all about? Do you not understand or know the history of the 20th century?
> Where do you get off telling a Muslim country that the United States does not consider itself a Christian country? Have you not read the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution of the United States?
> This country was founded on Judeo-Christian ethics and the principles governing this country, at least until you came along, come directly from this heritage. Do you not understand this?
> Your bowing to the king of Saudi Arabia is an affront to all Americans. Our President does not bow down to anyone, let alone the king of Saudi Arabia . You didn't show Great Britain, our best and one of our oldest allies, the respect they deserve yet you bow down to the king of Saudi Arabia .. How dare you, sir! How dare you!
> You can't find the time to visit the graves of our greatest generation because you don't want to offend the Germans but make time to visit a mosque in Turkey ... You offended our dead and every veteran when you give the Germans more respect than the people who saved the German people from themselves. What's the matter with you? I am convinced that you and the members of your administration have the historical and intellectual depth of a mud puddle and should be ashamed of yourselves, all of you.
> You are so self-righteously offended by the big bankers and the American automobile manufacturers yet do nothing about the real thieves in this situation, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Frank, Franklin Raines, Jamie Gorelic, the Fannie Mae bonuses, and the Freddie Mac bonuses. What do you intend to do about them? Anything? I seriously doubt it.
> What about the U.S. House members passing out $9.1 million in bonuses to their staff members - on top of the $2.5 million in automatic pay raises that lawmakers gave themselves? I understand the average House aide got a 17% bonus. I took a 5% cut in my pay to save jobs with my employer. You haven't said anything about that. Who authorized that? I surely didn't!
> Executives at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be receiving $210 million in bonuses over an eighteen-month period, that's $45 million more than the AIG bonuses. In fact, Fannie and Freddie executives have already been awarded $51 million - not a bad take. Who authorized that and why haven't you expressed your outrage at this group who are largely responsible for the economic mess we have right now.
> I resent that you take me and my fellow citizens as brain-dead and not caring about what you idiots do. We are watching what you are doing and we are getting increasingly fed up with all of you.
> I also want you to know that I personally find just about everything you do and say to be offensive to every one of my sensibilities. I promise you that I will work tirelessly to see that you do not get a chance to spend two terms destroying my beautiful country.
Sincerely,
Every real American
UNKNOWN
P.S. I rarely ask that emails be 'passed around'.............PLEASE SEND THIS TO YOUR EMAIL LIST......it's past time for all Americans to wake up!!!
I just love venum like this......
** FOOT NOTE **
A very good friend, Dale D, just informed me of this on Snopes. I respect and truly care for my friend Dale. His political viewpoints are different from mine, but we are both on the same page because we are both "clear thinkers". I'd hate it if I lived in a world where everyone believes in what I spout (pretty scary actually). Anyway, I digress. Dale brought this to my attention.. so, I am delivering it to you all who read my blog. I offer this site as a place for humor and controversy. Anyone can weigh in at any time.. good?
Snopes said the following: Origins: This letter to President Obama began circulation in May 2009 as something penned by a fourth grade teacher from Hillsboro, Missouri, named Kathleen Lyday. However, Ms. Lyday has disclaimed being it's author; An earlier version circulated in Mid April 2009 credits authorship to one Franklin T. Bell of Columbia, Maryland, who May or may not be its originator/ Last updated 1 June 2009
OK.. In this being brought to my attention: I am revising it's content in the beginning to reflect no author.
This unknown author told the truth and hit it right on the money. No fooling around. WOW what a letter!!!
This person stood up for what he / she believed in!!!!!! WAKE UP PEOPLE....
April 17, 2009
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington , DC 20500
Mr. Obama:
> I have had it with you and your administration, sir. Your conduct on your recent trip overseas has convinced me that you are not an adequate representative of the United States of America collectively or of me personally.
> You are so obsessed with appeasing the Europeans and the Muslim world that you have abdicated the responsibilities of the President of the United States of America. You are responsible to the citizens of the United States ... You are not responsible to the people of any other country on Earth.
> I personally resent that you go around the world apologizing for the United States telling Europeans that we are arrogant and do not care about their status in the world. Sir, what do you think the First World War and the Second World War were all about if not the consideration of the people of Europe ? Are you brain dead? What do you think the Marshall Plan was all about? Do you not understand or know the history of the 20th century?
> Where do you get off telling a Muslim country that the United States does not consider itself a Christian country? Have you not read the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution of the United States?
> This country was founded on Judeo-Christian ethics and the principles governing this country, at least until you came along, come directly from this heritage. Do you not understand this?
> Your bowing to the king of Saudi Arabia is an affront to all Americans. Our President does not bow down to anyone, let alone the king of Saudi Arabia . You didn't show Great Britain, our best and one of our oldest allies, the respect they deserve yet you bow down to the king of Saudi Arabia .. How dare you, sir! How dare you!
> You can't find the time to visit the graves of our greatest generation because you don't want to offend the Germans but make time to visit a mosque in Turkey ... You offended our dead and every veteran when you give the Germans more respect than the people who saved the German people from themselves. What's the matter with you? I am convinced that you and the members of your administration have the historical and intellectual depth of a mud puddle and should be ashamed of yourselves, all of you.
> You are so self-righteously offended by the big bankers and the American automobile manufacturers yet do nothing about the real thieves in this situation, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Frank, Franklin Raines, Jamie Gorelic, the Fannie Mae bonuses, and the Freddie Mac bonuses. What do you intend to do about them? Anything? I seriously doubt it.
> What about the U.S. House members passing out $9.1 million in bonuses to their staff members - on top of the $2.5 million in automatic pay raises that lawmakers gave themselves? I understand the average House aide got a 17% bonus. I took a 5% cut in my pay to save jobs with my employer. You haven't said anything about that. Who authorized that? I surely didn't!
> Executives at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be receiving $210 million in bonuses over an eighteen-month period, that's $45 million more than the AIG bonuses. In fact, Fannie and Freddie executives have already been awarded $51 million - not a bad take. Who authorized that and why haven't you expressed your outrage at this group who are largely responsible for the economic mess we have right now.
> I resent that you take me and my fellow citizens as brain-dead and not caring about what you idiots do. We are watching what you are doing and we are getting increasingly fed up with all of you.
> I also want you to know that I personally find just about everything you do and say to be offensive to every one of my sensibilities. I promise you that I will work tirelessly to see that you do not get a chance to spend two terms destroying my beautiful country.
Sincerely,
Every real American
UNKNOWN
P.S. I rarely ask that emails be 'passed around'.............PLEASE SEND THIS TO YOUR EMAIL LIST......it's past time for all Americans to wake up!!!
I just love venum like this......
** FOOT NOTE **
A very good friend, Dale D, just informed me of this on Snopes. I respect and truly care for my friend Dale. His political viewpoints are different from mine, but we are both on the same page because we are both "clear thinkers". I'd hate it if I lived in a world where everyone believes in what I spout (pretty scary actually). Anyway, I digress. Dale brought this to my attention.. so, I am delivering it to you all who read my blog. I offer this site as a place for humor and controversy. Anyone can weigh in at any time.. good?
Snopes said the following: Origins: This letter to President Obama began circulation in May 2009 as something penned by a fourth grade teacher from Hillsboro, Missouri, named Kathleen Lyday. However, Ms. Lyday has disclaimed being it's author; An earlier version circulated in Mid April 2009 credits authorship to one Franklin T. Bell of Columbia, Maryland, who May or may not be its originator/ Last updated 1 June 2009
OK.. In this being brought to my attention: I am revising it's content in the beginning to reflect no author.
Friday, June 19, 2009
New movie trailer,,, "2012"
All I can say is... WOW. What a trailer. Ya think this has a "Little" CGI (Computer Graphic Interface) in it???
IMAX you ask?? I'm there.
With the Mayan calendar ending in 2012, a large group of people must deal with natural disasters such as volcanic eruptions, typhoons, glaciers and lots of nude dancers
www.whowillsurvive2012.com/
IMAX you ask?? I'm there.
With the Mayan calendar ending in 2012, a large group of people must deal with natural disasters such as volcanic eruptions, typhoons, glaciers and lots of nude dancers
www.whowillsurvive2012.com/
Ms. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) is an Elitist A**hole
Ms. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) is an Elitist A-hole
In the military, they are taught to address all civilians by “Sir” or “Ma’am”.
It’s a title of respect and deference. In fact, the military standard becomes so ingrained in you, all military or ex-military that I know still respond to everybody with “Yes Sir” or “No Ma’am.”
If Ms. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) knew anything about the military (other than how much she loathes it and all it stands for), she would be honored and humbled to have a General in the United States Army refer to her with a respectful “ma’am”.
Instead, while questioning General Michael Walsh during a committee hearing, Ms. Boxer — who, from this day forward, I will never refer to as “Senator” again, because I don’t think she’s earned it or deserves the respect — decided to rudely interrupt the General’s answer to one of her questions to demand that he really respect her.
From Breitbart.TV:
Freak’n low-class, arrogant, self-important, elitist bitch.
Ms. Boxer is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than herself.
Men like General Michael Walsh.
I wish Gen. Walsh would have continued to refer to her as “Ma’am” — just to watch her freak out and go batshit crazy. She probably would have stormed out of the room cursing. Or crying. Likely both.
It would have been nice if he’d simply looked down at his chest full of medals, and remark,
No ma’am. You didn’t work hard to earn anything. You simply won an election. These medals were earned with real sacrifice, blood, sweat, devotion, and honor. Things you wouldn’t know anything about. In the military, our standard of address is “Ma’am” or “Sir”, so I’ll continue to address you in the manner that has served this Army for 234 years, thank you very much. Now, what was your whiny assed question again, ma’am?
Or, as a commenter at Breitbart suggested:
Well, another opportunity missed. He should have said, “Gladly Ma’am.” or, “Certainly Senator. I’m more comfortable with that anyways. Ma’am is gesture of respect. Senator is a job title.”
Of course he didn’t respond that way. Because, unlike Ms. Boxer, he has the class and respect of an officer and a gentleman.
In the military, they are taught to address all civilians by “Sir” or “Ma’am”.
It’s a title of respect and deference. In fact, the military standard becomes so ingrained in you, all military or ex-military that I know still respond to everybody with “Yes Sir” or “No Ma’am.”
If Ms. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) knew anything about the military (other than how much she loathes it and all it stands for), she would be honored and humbled to have a General in the United States Army refer to her with a respectful “ma’am”.
Instead, while questioning General Michael Walsh during a committee hearing, Ms. Boxer — who, from this day forward, I will never refer to as “Senator” again, because I don’t think she’s earned it or deserves the respect — decided to rudely interrupt the General’s answer to one of her questions to demand that he really respect her.
From Breitbart.TV:
Freak’n low-class, arrogant, self-important, elitist bitch.
Ms. Boxer is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than herself.
Men like General Michael Walsh.
I wish Gen. Walsh would have continued to refer to her as “Ma’am” — just to watch her freak out and go batshit crazy. She probably would have stormed out of the room cursing. Or crying. Likely both.
It would have been nice if he’d simply looked down at his chest full of medals, and remark,
No ma’am. You didn’t work hard to earn anything. You simply won an election. These medals were earned with real sacrifice, blood, sweat, devotion, and honor. Things you wouldn’t know anything about. In the military, our standard of address is “Ma’am” or “Sir”, so I’ll continue to address you in the manner that has served this Army for 234 years, thank you very much. Now, what was your whiny assed question again, ma’am?
Or, as a commenter at Breitbart suggested:
Well, another opportunity missed. He should have said, “Gladly Ma’am.” or, “Certainly Senator. I’m more comfortable with that anyways. Ma’am is gesture of respect. Senator is a job title.”
Of course he didn’t respond that way. Because, unlike Ms. Boxer, he has the class and respect of an officer and a gentleman.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
